Treasury decision incoming

Today's newsletter sets the stage for the Treasury Department's decision on what clean energy projects can receive tax credits due next week. The fate of hundreds of projects is at stake. You can read and share a full version of this story on Bloomberg.com. Plus, Brazil's COP30 lodging crunch is creating a major headache for the host country. For unlimited access to climate and energy news, please subscribe.

Survivor: clean energy projects edition

By Caitlin Reilly and Ari Natter

A Treasury Department decision due next week threatens to undermine the financial viability of hundreds of planned clean energy projects, adding to an escalating Trump administration campaign against wind and solar power.

President Donald Trump last month ordered the department to tighten long-standing guidance used to determine whether projects can qualify for clean-energy tax credits.

Until now, projects were eligible if developers spent at least 5% of the planned cost by a certain deadline. The president is pushing Treasury officials to significantly raise that amount or require developers to show more construction progress, which would make it more difficult, or even impossible, for many projects to qualify for the tax breaks that are often essential to their profitability.

Modules of the Oberon Solar plant near Desert Center, California. Photographer: Lauren Justice/Bloomberg

Developers' appetite to stick with the renewable energy projects or even secure financing for them will hinge on how far the Treasury Department goes in toughening eligibility standards.

More than 2,500 announced wind and solar projects — with a combined generating capacity equivalent to roughly 383 nuclear reactors — that have yet to begin construction could be affected by the Treasury Department's decision, said Atin Jain, an energy analyst with BloombergNEF.

In just the past few weeks, the Trump administration has targeted wind and solar power through a rapid-fire series of permitting reviews. It imposed standards that would essentially prevent new developments on federal land. It rescinded Biden-era decisions earmarking coastal waters for future wind turbines. And it revoked federal approval for a massive planned wind farm in Idaho.

Despite rising demand and prices for electricity, the impending tax guidance could deal the final blow to many wind and solar projects, said Rhone Resch, the chief executive officer of Advanced Energy Advisors, a risk management consulting firm for renewable energy development.

"Projects will get canceled," Resch said. "A lot of projects just aren't going to be able to adapt to these new deadlines."

Other developments, Resch added, will survive, but will take a hit to their profits.

More stringent standards for the tax credit also will drive up electric utility rates for consumers faster since renewables, particularly wind and solar, are the only energy sources that can be scaled up quickly to meet rising demand, said Brian Murphy, Ernst & Young LLP's Americas Power, Utilities and Renewables Tax Leader.

Trump's executive order last month signaling stricter limits for the tax credits set off a furious behind-the-scenes struggle within the Republican party, pitting senators sympathetic to wind and solar power against ultra-conservatives in the House hostile to renewable energy tax breaks.

Several Senate Republicans negotiated a longer phase-out period for wind and solar credits in exchange for supporting Trump's signature tax law. But the president also struck a deal with members of the hardline conservative House Freedom Caucus to use his executive authority to curtail the tax credits in order to win their support for the same bill.

Under the provision negotiated by Senate Republicans, wind and solar projects that qualify as under construction by July 4, 2026, would have four years to complete work and collect the credit. Otherwise, they would have to be ready for use by the end of 2027 to be eligible.

Long-standing Treasury guidance set a safe harbor deeming projects under construction if developers met the 5% spending threshold by the deadline.

That has been cast in doubt by Trump's executive order, issued last month just days after the tax law passed. Trump directed the Treasury Department to ensure projects cannot qualify for the credits unless "a substantial portion" of the facility is completed by the deadline next year. The president also urged the department to prevent "artificial acceleration" of wind and solar projects to qualify for the tax credits.

Developers thought "they had at least gotten to a point where now we know the new rules" when the tax bill passed, Murphy said. Then Trump's executive order kicked off "a new round of uncertainty."

Mike Carr, a partner at the government affairs firm Boundary Stone Partners who represents domestic solar manufacturers, said the impending Treasury Department guidance is now "the main game in town" for the sector.

Treasury Department spokespeople didn't respond to requests for comment.

Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, whose home state generates more than half its electricity from wind and whose support for the tax credit stretches back to a provision he helped insert into a 1992 energy law, has threatened to hold up confirmation of three Treasury Department nominees until he's certain the department's guidance adheres to "the law and congressional intent." Senator John Curtis, a Utah Republican, has joined him in the threat.

The two senators were still negotiating with the Trump administration as of Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Read the story in full on Bloomberg.com.

Clean energy funding is going away

$22 billion

The amount of green project investments canceled in the US in the first half of the year alone.

Transition troubles

"Rather than replacing fossil fuels, renewables are adding to the overall energy mix."

Statistical Review of World Energy

A report by the London-based Energy Institute found while renewables are rapidly expanding globally, energy demand is growing faster.

Logistical disarray for COP30

By John Ainger, Gabriel Diniz Tavares, and Daniel Carvalho

This year's United Nations climate summit, scheduled for November in Brazil, has been designed to make history by bringing world leaders, diplomats and some 50,000 other participants into the heart of the Amazon rain forest. Now the event increasingly risks being defined by a looming logistical fiasco.

With fewer than 100 days to go, Brazil is under fire from countries concerned about a shortage of hotel rooms and soaring accommodation costs in Belém, the host city selected for its proximity to the rain forest rather than its tourism infrastructure. Brazil's secretariat for COP30, as the summit is known, postponed a meeting set for Wednesday to address lodging issues; no new date announced.

In a 19-page letter reviewed by Bloomberg News from Brazil to several UN member countries participating in COP30, organizers rejected the idea of relocating the summit. "There will be no alternate location, as COP30 will not be moved from Belém," the letter stated, because the host city "already has a sufficient number of beds to accommodate all expected participants."

The letter included answers to 48 questions from several national delegations participating in the summit, and nearly half dealt with concerns about the high cost and low availability of accommodations. A COP30 spokesperson declined to confirm the letter.

As of Aug. 8, organizers said they had mapped 53,000 beds in Belém and nearby areas: 14,547 in hotels, 6,000 on a pair of cruise ships, 10,004 in vacation rentals via real estate companies, and 22,452 through Airbnb. The government says more options will be added to the official booking platforms BNetwork and Qualitours.

Accommodation prices have jumped to surpass luxury hotels in Rio de Janeiro. Reserving the one-bedroom "Doce Lar" (Sweet Home) apartment in Belém recently listed on Booking.com for the 11 days of the climate summit would cost a staggering 1.4 million reais ($267,380). A room with a king-size bed and ocean view at Rio's iconic Copacabana Palace would cost 96,223 reais.

Fears are growing these prices could shut out poorer nations. Special packages with reduced rates have been secured for delegations from small-island nations and the poorest countries, categories that include more than a third of UN members. The Brazilian government has said those delegations will receive 15 individual rooms at prices ranging from $100 to $200 per night. The remaining countries are guaranteed 10 individual rooms per delegation, with prices ranging from $200 to $600.

Read the full story, including why Brazil's efforts have so far failed to assuage concerns. For more news in the run up to climate talks, please subscribe.

More from Green

As Europe sweats through another summer of record-high temperatures, much of the continent is undergoing a rapid and often tense transformation.

Once seen as an American excess or Mediterranean necessity, air conditioning is becoming a fixture of life in places where it was long considered a luxury or even unwelcome. The shift reflects a new climate reality: Extreme heat is no longer rare across much of Europe. It's increasingly the new norm.

Photographer: Bloomberg/Bloomberg

Wind power output dipped as the UK broiled. Britain's wind turbines ground to a near halt this week, as another heat wave brought calm conditions and forced the nation to switch to gas for power generation.

Banks' climate club may see defections spread to Europe. An exodus from the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, an organization dedicated to decarbonizing global finance, started on Wall Street. Now it's spreading across the Atlantic, threatening the future of the world's largest climate alliance for banks.