Never fully beaten, inflation is coming back to life

To get John Authers' newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here. US inflation is turning upward again — at least in part beca
View in browser
Bloomberg

To get John Authers' newsletter delivered directly to your inbox, sign up here.

Today's Points:

Inflation's Turn for the Worse

With new higher tariffs now in force for three months, there was one question that the June consumer price index numbers needed to answer: Are tariffs at last beginning to push up inflation? The answer is an unsatisfying "probably." Much remains unclear, and there is plenty to argue about, but the data taken in the large make it impossible for the Federal Reserve to cut rates without a clear improvement.

As has been the case for a while, inflation is dominated by the services sector. Food inflation is also returning, although in a much smaller way than during the spike of 2021 and 2022. Falling energy prices keep the headline numbers down. This is our now-familiar One Big Beautiful Chart on how the components of inflation have moved:

Tariffs would raise their ugly head most obviously in core goods, excluding food and energy. Reviewing how much this sector contributed to overall inflation, we can say that the problem is still nothing serious, but also that the trend is plainly going in the wrong direction. Core goods inflation had been negative for many years before the post-pandemic spike. Its current rate is the highest in more than a decade, outside of that spike:

Exclude cars, and Omair Sharif of Inflation Insights LLC says core goods prices rose 0.55% in June, the most since November 2021. Tariffs aren't hurting terribly and the effect may prove transitory, but they are starting to bite. The reason for initial optimism when the report came out: Month-on-month core inflation, excluding food and fuel, was very slightly below economists' expectations as polled by Bloomberg. But that's been true for most of this year, and the gap is narrowing:

As always, a few components moved emphatically in different directions. The headline was helped by a fall in hotel prices, and shifted upward by rising used car prices. But a range of measures of underlying inflation watched by the Fed all showed price rises increasing again. This was true of the median and the trimmed mean (excluding outliers and averaging the rest); sticky prices, which are difficult to reduce; and the "supercore" measure of services excluding housing. All are back above the 3% upper bound of the Fed's target, and all are higher than they had been for decades before the spike (with the exception of the trimmed mean, which was briefly higher when oil prices were at an all-time high in 2008). The direction of travel matters, and it's going the wrong way:

None of this proves that tariffs are going to create another price spike. It does, however, suggest that progress on inflation has ended, without ever getting back to theFed's target. And when it comes to the cost of living for the working class, the issue that dominated last year's presidential election, the trend is again moving in the wrong direction. The chart below compares the Atlanta Fed wagetracker data on salary rises for the first quartile (the least well-paid 25% of the working population) with food inflation, and with Bloomberg's anti-core inflation, which combines food and energy, calculated by my colleague Carolyn Silverman. Wage rises are still ahead of food and anti-core inflation, but the gap is narrowing. And anyone wanting to know how Donald Trump won the elections of 2016 and 2024 should look at how far inflation outstripped wage rises for long tracts of the Obama and Biden administrations:

One other tariff indicator. The US is proposing a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports. Announced last week, this came as a big surprise. As Brazil provides about a third of US Arabica coffee, it's a tad alarming that June was the worst month for instant coffee inflation in three decades:

Put all of this together, and there's little obvious case to move rates. That seems to be what the fed funds futures market judges, as the chances of a cut in September are now their lowest this year, at barely over 50%. Three months ago, the market was pricing a certainty of three cuts by then:

This had a predictable impact on the bond market, with the 30-year Treasury yield creeping back above 5%. The Fed has cut overnight rates by a full percentage point since the 30-year first topped 5% almost two years ago, so the problem of long rates isn't one over which the central bank has much control (although this didn't stop an impassioned presidential tweet to cut rates NOW because consumer prices are LOW):

Taken in all, this should have been sobering for the stock market. It wasn't.

Never Mind the Breadth, Feel the Height

Stock markets continue to brush off inflation or tariffs. The Nasdaq 100 closed at a record; the S&P 500 was close to one. But they're back to relying on the big tech platforms. Nvidia Corp., aided by news that it will be allowed to sell its best AI chips to China, rose 4.04%. The Nasdaq rose by 29 points; exclude Nvidia and it fell by 58.

Breadth has been visibly lacking, as Bloomberg News has reported.  The Magnificent Seven index of megacap stocks has surged about 36% from its April lows, compared to 25% for the S&P. Bloomberg Intelligence strategists Gina Martin Adams and Gillian Wolff say the rally is powered by 10% of stocks, down from a 22% average between 2010 and 2024. That's not a good sign. 

Meanwhile, the S&P 500 cap-weighted index broke to a new high compared to the equal-weighted version, in which each member accounts for 0.2%. That took out a high from a year ago that prompted a drastic rotation toward smaller stocks:

The Magnificent Seven have also recovered from last July's correction. They're at a new high compared to the small-cap Russell 2000 index:

Overall, the S&P 500 is up 6.16% for the year, but 219 member stocks are down. Vincent Deluard of StoneX Financial says the rally is "carried by the Magnificent Seven, which foreign investors have not sold because these companies have no equivalent outside of the US." Describing the country as "an emerging market with magnificent monopolies," he suggests it's vulnerable to an EM-like selloff once liquidity tightens. It certainly looks unhealthily narrow. 

A Stimulus Prescription

Beijing's economic growth story is showing a fragile resilience in the face of growing global efforts to "de-risk" from China. Second-quarter gross domestic product growth was modestly lower than its previous advance, but remains on course to meet an ambitious year-end growth target of 5%.

Exports continue to be the driver despite tariffs. That underscores the fragility of this expansion, especially as the property sector's problems drag on. A breakdown of the export data shows cracks are forming. US shipments shrank by $35 billion year-on-year in the second quarter. China's trade balance with the country peaked in 2022:

However, exports to regions such as the European Union, Africa, Asean, and North Asia made up for the shortfall and brought the last 12 months' exports to a new record:

That suggests that the trade realignment Beijing seeks is happening, but policymakers must be prepared for trade-offs. Oxford Economics' Louise Loo notes that price discounting is eroding China's terms of trade and intensifying disinflationary pressures. That has now turned into outright deflation. The GDP deflator, which tracks average price changes over time, fell 1.2% year-over-year in its ninth consecutive quarterly drop. That's the longest streak since records began in 1993, and the sharpest since the Global Financial Crisis year of 2009:

Turning this around will take more than exports. Further, US importers are building stockpiles while the US-China trade truce lasts. That could weigh on exports later this year — a risk that policymakers can't afford as Washington pushes on with tariffs. 

Attempts to boost domestic consumption have largely failed to deliver, with retail sales now slowing down. As Gavekal Research's Wei He observes, softening domestic demand will force the question of whether incremental stimulus is justified. Policymakers at this week's Central Urban Work Conference, the first in nearly a decade, reinforced speculation that imminent help for the property sector may not amount to much:

The meeting communique called to "steadily promote the renovation of urban villages and dilapidated housing," but said that China is shifting to "a stage in which the focus is on raising the quality and efficiency of the existing stock" — comments that do not imply a major stimulus in the offing. 

Regardless, Oxford's Loo expects housing to feature prominently at this month's Politburo meeting. Without immediate policy help, the slump continues:  

Given the structural and demographic headwinds, we expect any property easing in the second half to be measured rather than aggressive, given that there is no fundamental or demographic basis for stimulating a housing demand upswing in China.

China's earlier efforts to rein in credit help explain nominal yields' fall close to historic lows. The moment when they dip below those of Japan, long gripped by deflation, grows nearer:

Bank of America's Claudio Piron observes that Beijing's approach has had the unintended consequence of disinflation relative to its trading partners. Since January 2018, this has caused a real trade-weighted appreciation of the dollar for the manufacturing sector, and a depreciation for the yuan equivalent:

The irony, as Piron notes, is that this is exactly what the respective manufacturing sectors don't want — the US is trying to boost manufacturing exports, while China aims to shift toward greater domestic consumption. Further, a divergence in their response to Covid, fiscal stimulus, housing cycles, and now tariffs have added up to higher and steeper nominal yields in the US and lower, flatter yields in China, as illustrated in this BofA chart:

As real rates are still positive, thanks to deflation, low yields may not help China's growth that much, and that raises concerns over the sustainability of its debt dynamics.

Richard Abbey

Survival Tips

Some more, belated music for July 14th, Bastille Day: Try Bastille Day by Rush, Revolution Rock by The Clash, Revolution by The Cult, Revolution by Bob Marley & the Wailers, Through the Barricades by Spandau Ballet, James' Break Down the Government Walls, Heads Will Roll by The Yeah Yeah Yeahs (or covered by Scarlett Johansson), The Guillotine by The Coup, and Talkin' Bout a Revolution by Tracy Chapman. Any more? Also, the list of musical letters somehow missed Elvis Presley's Return to Sender. Sorry about that. 

More From Bloomberg Opinion

Want more Bloomberg Opinion? OPIN. Or you can subscribe to our daily newsletter.

Like Bloomberg's Points of Return? Subscribe for unlimited access to trusted, data-based journalism in 120 countries around the world and gain expert analysis from exclusive daily newsletters like Markets Daily or Odd Lots.

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.

Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Points of Return newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent Ad Choices

No comments

Powered by Blogger.