Which green sectors lose in GOP tax plan

EV and rooftop solar facing biggest impacts |
Bloomberg

Today's newsletter looks at House Republicans' plan to help pay for President Donald Trump's proposed tax cuts by gutting clean energy incentives — and the pushback from key Senate Republicans. You can read and share the full stories about the House proposal and the blowback on Bloomberg.com. For unlimited access to climate and energy news, please subscribe

Disappearing climate incentives

By Ari Natter and Mark Chediak

House Republicans released their first stab at a bill to extend President Donald Trump's tax cuts, which would help pay for them by overhauling much of former President Joe Biden's landmark climate law. 

Workers install solar panels on a home in San Francisco. Photographer: Michaela Vatcheva/Bloomberg

The draft framework put out Monday by the Ways and Means Committee takes aim at billions of dollars of incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act, including tax credits for electric vehicles and solar and wind projects — subsidies Trump has derided as part of a "green new scam."

Several segments of clean energy stand to lose out under the framework, which is an early blueprint and will likely see revisions during the legislative process. Electric vehicle credits would end after next year. A home clean energy credit would terminate after this year, making rooftop-solar systems more expensive for consumers who want to buy them. 

But some segments would fare far better than had been feared in the weeks leading up to the release of the proposal. Tax credits for making solar panels or batteries in the US would, for example, be phased out just a year earlier than scheduled. The draft bill takes more of a "scalpel than a sledgehammer" to the IRA, said analysts with Jefferies.

Still, it's mostly bad news for the US clean energy sector and for efforts to reduce the nation's climate emissions, which the IRA was estimated to cut by 43% to 48% below 2005 levels over the next decade, according to one analysis.

The overhaul would raise energy costs for US households by as much as 7% in 2035, according to a preliminary analysis by the Rhodium Group. The plan would save the government more than $560 billion on energy tax credits over 10 years, according to an official non-partisan congressional estimate. 

But the House proposal is far from final and is already facing pushback in the Senate. There, key Republicans have vowed to soften the blow for emerging technologies. 

The plan "needs refinement," said Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, who serves on the Senate's tax writing committee and was one of four Republicans to sign a letter to Senate leadership last month vowing to defend Democrats' Inflation Reduction Act's energy tax credits. "It needs more transitions. It's not quite what we would author out here." 

Senator Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican and moderate who also signed the April letter vowing to defend the credits, said she anticipated changes. 

"Anything that comes over from the House, almost by law, we've got to redo," Murkowski told reporters.

While there are almost certainly compromises ahead, the draft offers a measuring stick of how much and what House Republicans want to cut — and where the biggest fights might be with their Senate counterparts. Here's who loses big, and not quite so big, under the proposal.

Big losers

EV makers and buyers

Tesla Inc., General Motors Co. and other electric vehicle makers and their customers stand to be among the biggest losers. Biden's climate law extended a lucrative tax credit of up to $7,500 for the purchase of an EV and also expanded the credit to allow used and commercial electric vehicles to qualify. The Republican tax plan would eliminate the consumer vehicle credit by the end of next year. Only carmakers that have sold fewer than 200,000 EVs by the end of this year would would be eligible to receive it in 2026. The GOP proposal also ends credits for used and commercial electric vehicles. The repeal of all three credits would result in more than $190 billion in savings for the government over 10 years, according to the congressional estimate. 

Solar-shopping homeowners

Homeowners who want to buy solar panels and other clean energy systems for their homes would lose a popular 30% tax credit that would be repealed at year's end under the proposal. The move, if it becomes law, would be a blow for those who want to invest in producing their own clean energy as a hedge against rising utility bills and power outages. The tax change will also hurt solar-equipment makers such as Enphase Energy Inc. and SolarEdge Technologies Inc. The move would save the government $77 billion over 10 years, according to the estimate. 

Not-so-big losers

Utility-scale renewables

The Republican plan phases out and and puts new restrictions on a pair of investment and production tax credits for wind, solar and other clean electricity production. Both credits would start to phase down for projects placed in service starting in 2029, and would completely end for any projects after 2031. In addition, the Republican bill doesn't allow projects that use materials from foreign adversaries such as China and Russia. And the transferability of tax credits would also be pinched, which utilities developing renewables say would result in higher customer bills. 

But the news for solar and wind was better than expected, since many investors had anticipated a swifter phase-out. JPMorgan analysts said the GOP plan "aligns with, or exceeds, the more bullish end of investor expectations." Shares of First Solar Inc. climbed on Monday.  —With Emma Sanchez

Read the full story about the House's plan as well as the response to it from key senators. To stay up to date on the evolving climate policy landscape, please subscribe.

Revising the timeline

2029
The House proposal would phase out a technology-neutral tax credits for green energy projects that begin operating that year. "I think that the newer credits that have yet to really be applied will need to be extended beyond 2029," Senator Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican, told reporters in the Capitol Tuesday.

Silver lining

"The proposal is mostly a win for US solar manufacturers and developers. The fear is that the investment and production tax credits could have been gutted sooner."
Rob Barnett
Senior analyst, Bloomberg Intelligence

A US clean tech exodus?

By Frances Schwartzkopff

Clean tech companies that were eligible for support under former President Joe Biden are now considering leaving the US as the Trump administration pulls the plug on financing, according to the former head of the program that vetted the firms.

As director of the Loan Programs Office at the US Department of Energy when Biden was president, Jigar Shah helped select roughly 400 companies with development plans to receive grants and loans upwards of $100 million each.

Shah, who last year was included in Time magazine's list of the most influential people for his contribution to advancing the clean-energy transition, said that since the inauguration of Donald Trump in January, many of the companies that benefited from Biden-era programs are now looking to shift all or part of their business outside the US.

Against that backdrop, Shah said in an interview that he's been talking to officials in Brussels about re-domiciling companies in Europe. About two-thirds of the businesses are currently headquartered in the US, he said. Among clean-tech industries represented are nuclear power generation, suppliers for heat pumps and batteries, carbon capture and storage, and hydrogen.

For more, read the full story

More from Green

Taiwanese lawmakers revised a nuclear power bill on Tuesday that effectively opens the door for a restart of the island's atomic plants, a move that underscores a wider policy shift as its energy demand grows and geopolitical tensions worsen.

Thames Water said it can't rule out needing to ask customers to restrict water usage this summer as drought conditions loom amid the driest start to spring in 69 years. The utility serves about a quarter of the UK.

Chinese solar stocks jumped after local media reported a major firm was in talks with peers about an industry-wide output cut in a bid to support prices that have hit rock bottom due to oversupply.

Worth a listen

Australia is in a unique place when it comes to the energy transition. It is the world's largest exporter of coal and a leading exporter of gas, yet has set a target to have 82% renewable electricity by 2030 and hit net-zero by 2050. The Pacific nation is also caught juggling relations between the US — its military ally — and China — its biggest trading partner — as the two superpowers compete over trade.

It is an unenviable challenge for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who has just been voted back into the office with an impressive new majority and also wants Australia to host the COP31 climate summit in 2026.

But the Labor Party's climate credentials will be put to test very soon, says David Stringer, Bloomberg Green's Asia managing editor, on this week's episode of Zero. Listen now, and subscribe on Apple,  Spotify, or YouTube to get new episodes of Zero every Thursday.

More from Bloomberg

  • Hyperdrive for expert insight into the future of cars
  • Energy Daily for a daily guide to the energy and commodities markets that power the global economy
  • CityLab Daily for top stories, ideas and solutions, from cities around the world
  • Tech In Depth for analysis and scoops about the business of technology

Explore all Bloomberg newsletters.

Follow Us

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.


Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Green Daily newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent Ad Choices

No comments

Powered by Blogger.